What we have here on the right is a water butt also known as a rainwater tank. These are large containers which collect rainwater so are an environmentally friendly way for people to save water so that they can water the plants in their garden during a dryer season. A very clever idea and totally inoffensive.
Context is everything
However… the word ‘butt’ can also refer to your bottom. Well not your bottom of course, I wouldn’t be so rude as to make any comment about your own bottom, I mean bottoms in general.
In the United States a less polite word for bottom is ‘ass’ (which also means ‘donkey’ in the UK) but there are times when saying or writing the word ‘ass’ wouldn’t be so polite and for those situations you might use another word, like butt.
Well that’s probably just making it worse
In an effort to make online communications politer people have tried a variety of tactics. Sometimes a word is on a banned list so if you were to type it into your message it wouldn’t send and you have to come up with a different way of saying it. Or your system could use regular expressions (‘regex’) to find all instances of a word or phrase in published text and replace it with something deemed more appropriate and less offensive.
If you were to replace all instances of ‘ass’ with ‘butt’ in a piece of text you’d increase the politeness of your communication, but you wouldn’t necessarily increase its readability. It’s a clbuttic mistake, produce by a software filter that’s a little too broad in its reach. In that last sentence you can see what happens when I replace the ‘ass’ in classic with ‘butt’ – absolute gibberish.
Of course, people noticed
If you had to write, politely, about clothing you might prefer to put ‘trousers’ rather than ‘pants’ (in the US meaning, rather than underwear) but you might be a bit irritated if your other article on housing referenced ‘occutrousers’ rather than ‘occupants’…
My favourite (real-world) example of this silliness was when a newspaper article referenced the fact that a historical American president had been ‘buttbuttinated’ instead of ‘assassinated’.
Although that really happened and a few other pages on the internet were filled with nonsense words* people did notice pretty quickly (I mean you would, wouldn’t you?!) and rapidly solved it by tweaking their filters to make sure that unwanted words that are found within a word were left alone, and perhaps they did a bit of proofreading to double-check too.
[*mostly it’s now articles like this drawing attention to the problem!]
I’ve made this mistake too
I wish I’d done a bit of proofreading when I did what I thought was a clever ‘find and replace’. A couple of thousand schools and home educators in the UK receive free copies of our printed CS4FN magazine (if your school would like to sign up…) and I keep all the addresses stored in a password-protected spreadsheet with different columns for the name, lines of the address, post code etc.
One day I had the brilliant idea of tidying up the ‘Country’ column in my database so that if someone had typed ‘UK’ it would now say ‘United Kingdom’.
Unfortunately I did this as a ‘global’ (across the entire spreadsheet) find and replace instead of specifying more clearly what should be changed. I didn’t realise until a few magazines came back as undeliverable because the address made absolutely no sense. If your teacher’s name was Luke or your school name or address had a ‘Duke’ in it I had now managed to turn these into “LUnited Kingdome” or “DUnited Kingdome”.
Oops!
– Jo Brodie, Queen Mary University of London
Share this post
Part of a series of ‘whimsical fun in computing’ to celebrate April Fool’s (all month long!).
Subscribe to be notified whenever we publish a new post to the CS4FN blog.
This page is funded by EPSRC on research agreement EP/W033615/1.
cs4fn 